Review of Jack Russell Weinstein ’ s Adam Smith ’ s pluralism : rationality , education , and the moral sentiments
نویسندگان
چکیده
Jack Russell Weinstein's new book sets itself two major tasks: to argue that Adam Smith offers " a coherent philosophy of education that permeates his system " (p. 216) and that Smith's thinking is interestingly attuned to the very modern problem of pluralism. The first strand of argument seeks to provide a way of reading Smith that demystifies some of the remaining ambiguity across his oeuvre. The second sees in Smith an anticipation of current debates about cultural diversity and pluralism. In seeking to apply Smithian ideas in a contemporary setting Weinstein rejects the limiting over-emphasis on contextualism. His approach accepts the importance of getting Smith 'right' through historically informed readings, but denies that this is where the inquiry must cease. As Weinstein himself admits this is a difficult task (p. 9), but it is a potentially profitable approach and one which is proving increasingly attractive. Weinstein aims to examine Smith's potential contribution to contemporary debates on pluralism by offering " the first full-length investigation of Smith's philosophy of education and his theory of rationality " (p. 15). Weinstein provides an interpretation of Smith that sees his writings as characterised by the desire to provide an expansive account of human rationality. He points out Smith's attempts to distance himself from a dependence on formal logic and stresses Smith's interest in rhetoric and narrative notions of learning and rationality. The early chapters trace Smith's interaction with Mandeville, Shaftesbury, and Hutcheson, suggesting that his dissatisfaction with elements of the thought of each is combined with a facility for absorbing what is of use. There is a particularly interesting comparison of Smithian spectatorship and Shaftesbury's soliloquy (p. 44), which opens the way into the idea of rationality that runs through Weinstein's reading. Both Smith's impartial spectator and Shaftesbury's soliloquy involve
منابع مشابه
The Invisible Hand of Rationality: On the Intersection of
The connection between Adam Smith and Alasdair MacIntyre is not evident at first glance. In fact, those who know MacIntyre's work might bristle at the association. MacIntyre is inherently anti-capitalist. He believes that moral people ought to reject the modern state and large-scale corporations. 1 He also rejects what he terms the enlightenment project, claiming not only that it failed but tha...
متن کاملOverlapping Consensus or Marketplace of Religions? Rawls and Smith
In this paper, I examine the claim that Rawls’s overlapping consensus is too narrow to allow most mainstream religions’ participation in political discourse. I do so by asking whether religious exclusion is a consequence of belief or action, using conversion as a paradigm case. After concluding that this objection to Rawls is, in fact, defensible, and that the overlapping consensus excludes bot...
متن کاملAdam Smith and the Stages of Moral Development
The writer explores Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments, where Smith presents a rich and provocative account of morality. The writer offers an explication of Smith's moral psychology as a stage theory of moral development, with the intention of generating critical points on both mattes of detail and larger implications.
متن کاملHume and Smith on Sympathy , Approbation , and Moral Judgment
David Hume and Adam Smith are usually, and understandably, seen as developing very similar sentimentalist accounts of moral thought and practice. Hume’s views are better known, not least because Smith’s work on moral sentiments fell in the shadow of his tremendously influential Wealth of Nations. This shadowing is unfortunate, both because Smith’s work on moral sentiments is deeply insightful a...
متن کاملEconomics and Moral Sentiments: The Case of Moral Hazard
The purpose of this paper is to develop the argument that sentiments (including moral sentiments) are endemic to the building of knowledge about the economy, as well as the functioning of the economy itself. This contrasts with the mainstream treatment of sentiment as separable from rationality, such that it is seen (if at all) as requiring an ex post modification of rational choice theory. The...
متن کامل